Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Kabrich

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 11, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Action in habeas corpus. Petitioner is deprived of his liberty by John J. Cullen and James J. Kenny, agents of the State of California, who seek to confine him in a penitentiary of that State to serve the balance of a term for second degree robbery.

On serving about four years of said term, and on January 28, 1929, .petitioner was paroled on condition, among other things, that he go to Siloam Springs, Arkansas, and report to G: I. B. Kabrich, who agreed to give him employment. He complied with this condition. Thereafter California permitted him to go to Missouri. On April 5, 1930, he was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Boothe v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Ex parte GourleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API