Legal Opinion

Mastin Bank v. Hammerslough

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from, Jackson Special Law and Equity Court. — Hon-R. E. Cowan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

The plaintiff sued defendants in a justice’s, court on the following note :

$200. Sixty days after date we promise to pay to the Kansas City.National Bank $200. October 5th, 1874.

J. R. Marsh,

E. A. Stevens.

On the back of the note J. W. McIntosh and Hammerslougb wrote their names, and not being payees or indorsers, they were joint makers.' Powell v. Thomas, 7 Mo. 430; Schneider v. Schiffman, 20 Mo. 571; Baker v. Block, 30 Mo. 225; Chaffee v. Railroad Co., 64 Mo. 193; Semple v. *275Turner, 65 Mo. 696. Plaintiff filed the note with the justice, but filed no other statement of his cause of action-There…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. SchiffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  2. Christy v. PriceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  3. Chaffe v. Memphis, Carthage & Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Baker v. BlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  5. Semple v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of HonorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Mirrielees v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. State Bank of Fisk v. Omega Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. First National Bank v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. National Tube Works Co. v. Ring Refrigerating & Ice Machine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API