Legal Opinion

State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Johnson County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 2003No. 02-0164PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the district court had authority to consider a tardy motion to review the state public defender’s decision on an attorney fee claim. We hold it did not, and therefore we sustain a writ of certiorari challenging the court’s ruling on the late-filed motion.

I. Background. Attorney Alan Bohan-an represented an indigent mother in a child-in-need-of-assistance case. Upon completion of the case, he filed a claim for payment of his fees with the state public defender. See Iowa Code § 13B.4(4)(c) (2001) (providing for state public defender’s approval…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. IBP, Inc. v. HarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Bousman v. Iowa District Court for Clinton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. American Legion, Hanford Post 5 v. Cedar Rapids Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Warren CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PickettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. State v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Denison Municipal Utilities v. Iowa Workers' Compensation CommissionerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. State Public Defender v. Iowa District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API