Legal Opinion

Tomashevsky v. Komori Printing MacHinery Co., Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 16, 1988No. 87-7018-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE has come before the court upon the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jursidiction of the defendant Imperial Equipment, Inc. (“Imperial”). This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiffs, Richard Tomashevsky and his wife, Yael Tomashevsky. Plaintiffs contend that a printing press which was manufactured in Japan by Komori Printing Machinery Company (Komori) and imported by Imperial was marketed in an unreasonably dangerous condition and caused plaintiffs’ injuries. Plaintiffs have filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murante v. Pedro Land, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  2. CHINA PROD. NW, INC. v. DJ Broesamle Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Relco Shoe Machine, Ltd. v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Pipistrel D.O.O., Etc. v. Susan L. Ciccolini, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API