Legal Opinion

City of Spring Valley v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1972No. B-3129PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Justice.

The question here is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a temporary injunction sought by the City of Spring Valley to prevent the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company from constructing in a residentially zoned area a parking lot to be used in connection with its central office building.

The Court of Civil Appeals concurred in the trial court’s judgment that the parking facility was exempt by Article 101 li from city zoning regulations because of its necessity for maintenance and use of the telephone company’s central office building. 1 It held that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Dallas v. MalloyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. City of Spring Valley v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Telephone Equipment Network, Inc. v. Ta/Westchase Place, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. University Interscholastic League v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Highlands Management Co. v. First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API