Legal Opinion

Young v. St. Louis University

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1989No. 53958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment based on the jury verdict finding against her and in favor of defendants St. Louis University and Richard Stensrude, Director of St. Louis University Medical Center. We affirm.

Appellant brought suit in the lower court on the theory of intentional infliction of emotional distress allegedly caused by Dr. Stensrude’s screening in her presence of a *145pornographic video-tape, Deep Throat. Appellant’s theory was that this action, coupled with the environment in which the film was shown, allegedly caused her to suffer from a non-psychotic mental condition know as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Iota Management Corp. v. Boulevard Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. DeArmon v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Breeding v. Dodson Trailer Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Baker v. AtkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Disbrow v. BoehmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WolteringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Pippin v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Pippin v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API