Morris v. Bogue Development Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabKsoN, J.
Tbis is a civil action brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover $1,000. Tbe amended complaint alleges “being tbe brokerage due tbe plaintiff for bis services, time and skill.”
For tbe purpose of impeacbment, tbe defendant offered in evidence tbe original, or first, complaint filed in tbe action. Tbis was objected to by plaintiff, and sustained by tbe court below. In tbis we tbink there was error.
In Norcum v. Savage, 140 N. C., 472, it was decided: Where defendant bad been permitted to file an amended answer, tbe original answer containing admissions was admissible. Adams v. Utley, 87…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Cummings v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Guy v. . ManuelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Adams v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Norcum v. Savage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Winborne v. . McMahanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Davis v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Capps v. BlondeauNorth Carolina Business Court · 2010
- Gore v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.