Vanderbilt v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
This action was commenced by the issuance of summons on 19 May, 1921. It is admitted that the cause of action accrued on 2 April, 1917. The statute of limitations, therefore, began to run on that date, and more than four years had expired before the action was commenced. The objection that the action was not commenced within the period prescribed by statute was duly taken in the answer. C. S., 404, 405.
The period of time prescribed by the statute of limitations in force in North Carolina, at the date when plaintiff’s cause 'of action accrued, and within which same must be commenced, was three…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Stewart v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gregory J. Mraz and Winifred Mraz, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Waldrop v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Sayer v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.