Theobalt v. Wiemann
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Defendant in error was plaintiff in the court below, and plaintiff in error was defendant. We shall refer to plaintiff in error as appellant apd defendant in error as appellee.
Appellant Theobalt was an automobile dealer in Port Arthur, Tex. He sold Essex Terraplane automobiles. On July 29, 1935, he sold appellee Wiemann a 1935 model Terraplane sedan for $825. Wiemann traded in a 1930 model Chevrolet coach for the agreed price of $165. The $165 was credited on the purchase price of the Terraplane, and he executed notes in payment of the remainder of the consideration for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Pelton v. Allen Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Brammer Wilder v. Limeston CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Breeding v. NalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Wichita Falls & S. R. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- C. v. Hill & Co. v. FrickeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Thompson v. ErismanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. FaulhaberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.