Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coker v. Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1924Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

McCulloch, C. J.

The two decisions of this court cited by the majority (Buell v. State, 45 Ark. 336; Paralee v. Camden, 49 Ark. 165) hold that, whilst munieipipalities m;ay suppress bawdy houses by ‘‘prohibiting the keeping of such places, by forbidding the renting of premises for such purposes, and by other like prohibitions,” the mere presence of a prostitute in the municipality cannot be declared to be a crime. That is the full t extent of those decisions. The sole effect of the other decisions cited hy the majority is that prostitutes cannot he denied the right of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Paralee v. CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API