Legal Opinion

Savage v. Rhea

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1931No. Motion No. 9419; 1194-5538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

Plaintiffs in error complain of our refusal to consider certain assignments contained in their application for writ of error because not supported by the record as filed with us in this case.

Counsel assert that this case [33 S.W.(2d) 429] and Elizabeth Savage v. A. B. Cowen, 33 S.W.(2d) 433, concerning an adjoining lot, were tried together and involve the same chain of title, except in the other case it appeared that C. M. Rhea, defendant in error here, conveyed the lot there involved to A. B. Cowen; the deed to Cowen being in question in that ease, and that alone makes the difference.

Counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savage v. RHEATexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Savage v. CowenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coakley v. ReisingTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Garner v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API