Huyett-Smith Manufacturing Co. v. Gray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by ITuyett-Smitb Manufacturing Company against Ralph Gray and Ira Gray, administrators of S. II. Gray, beard by Judge A. L. Coble and a jury, at Pali Term, 1900, of the Superior Court of CeaveN County. Erom a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtClaek, J.
This action began 20th January, 1890, to recover possession of a “dry-kiln hot-blast apparatus” which plaintiff sold to defendant for the price of $2,337, title retained till purchase-money paid, and on which only $400 has been paid. The case has been pending ever since, and four opinions therein have been heretofore written in this Court. In the meantime, the defendant has gone on using the machine, and the evidence in the last trial below is that the machinery is now only a lot of scrap-iron worth $100. That, and the bill of costs (which doubtless is much more than $100) and the replevin…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marsh v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Turner v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co. v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co. v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Cable Co. v. . MacOnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Allen v. Tompkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Hardie-Tynes Manufacturing Co. v. Easton Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.