Legal Opinion

Seckinger v. Exchange Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1928No. 18930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The provision in section 3546 of the Civil Code (1910), relative to discharge of a surety, guarantor, or indorser of a promissory note on failure of the creditor, after notice from the surety, guarantor, or indorser, to bring suit against the principal within a required time, that “no notice shall be considered a compliance with the requirements of this section which does not state the county of the principal’s residence,” requires actual notice. Constructive notice, if there be any, arising by virtue of an act of the legislature incorporating a city, that the city is in a particular…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ware v. City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Smith v. Morris Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gettis v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API