Legal Opinion

Pacific National Bank v. Hernreich

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1966No. 5-3793PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Johnson, Justice.

This appeal involves two apparently conflicting Arkansas statutes.

Appellee George Hernreich, operator of a jewelry store in Fort Smith, executed three promissory notes payable to W. F. Sebel Co., Inc., a foreign corporation. Sebel Company, a wholesaler of diamond jewelry, was not qualified to do business in Arkansas. Hernreich had been doing business with Sebel Company for two decades prior to this litigation. The testimony reflects that this was their manner of doing business: Sebel Company’s salesman, Sam Leibson, with his entire stock of diamond jewelry, would call on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hogan v. Intertype Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guaranty National Insurance v. Denver Roller, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., and F. E. Slaughter, as GuarantorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Middle Georgia Livestock Sales v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Sandler v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lane v. Midwest Bancshares CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API