Legal Opinion

Wogenstahl v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 16, 2023No. 1:17-cv-00298Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI JEFFREY A. WOGENSTAHL, Petitioner, : Case No. 1:17-cv-298 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, : Respondent. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6)(ECF No. 58). Respondent opposes the Motion (ECF No. 59) and Petitioner has filed both a Reply Memorandum in support (ECF No. 60) and a Notice of Additional…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Louis David Johnson, Jr. v. Unknown Dellatifa (03-1497/1880) Unknown Carline (03-1506/1865) S. Powers (03-1555/1833) Dave Stasewish (03-1559/1835)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API