Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Frey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1984No. D82-0117; CA A29894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Father appeals the trial court’s custody award and property division. We affirm.

Father first contends that the trial judge awarded custody to mother solely because she is the mother. The judge stated, in relevant part:

“We are told as trial judges that we are not to emphasize any one of the factors that go into the custody decision over the others, and by mentioning any I don’t want to create a misimpression that the Court has overlooked the others, but one thing that we should not lose sight of is that we’re talking about a year-and-a-half old child, a baby, and having raised three I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tingen v. TingenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McFadden v. McFaddenOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Matter of Marriage of BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API