Legal Opinion

Creel v. Cloyd

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 21, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Taylor Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the-Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirming.

Suits were instituted in the Taylor circuit court against James E. Creel and his two sons, by John W. Cloyd and Smith & Flora, creditors of James E. Creel, in which they sought to have a conveyance, by s'aid Creel to his two sons; .set aside, on the ground that it was without consideration and for the fraudulent purpose of defeating* them in the collection of their debts. The defendant, James E. Creel, admitted the indebtedness, hut denied that the conveyance was made for a fraudulent purpose; and pleaded affirmatively that it was for a valuable…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Graham's Administrator v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Griggs v. Crane's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Roberts, Johnson & Rand v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Harris v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Rye v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API