Legal Opinion

Enz v. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 5, 1927No. 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Rogers.

The interference originally involved four counts. Count 1 is illustrative of the two counts now involved, and reads as follows:

“1. In a water turbine having a runner and a plurality of gates for controlling the fl.ow of water to the runner, a gate operating mechanism comprising a movable shifting member, and adjustable connecting means between said shifting member and the different gates, said means comprising for each…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humiston v. VoorheesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API