Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The learned trial court erroneously entertained a motion made under the same circumstances as those set out in Dougherty v. Salt (227 N. Y. 200, decided in 1919). Although the motion to dismiss should not have been heard at the time when *277it was made, nevertheless a just result was reached in spite of the error, since in our view there was no evidence to justify the verdict. An appellate court under these circumstances now has power to affirm the final judgment. (N. Y. Const. art. 6, § 8, in effect Jan. 1, 1926, and Civil Practice Act, § 584, as amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 215, April 2, 1926.)

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briskman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Siberian Fur & Flax Co. v. Irving Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API