Legal Opinion

Fosness v. Panagos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1965No. Calendar 10, 11; Docket 50,698, 50,699Published

1Opinion of the Court

376 Mich. 485 (1965)

138 N.W.2d 380

FOSNESS

v.

PANAGOS.

Calendar Nos. 10, 11; Docket Nos. 50,698, 50,699.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided December 7, 1965.

Rehearing denied February 8, 1966.

Goodman, Crockett, Eden, Robb & Philo (Dean A. Robb and Sheldon M. Meizlish, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Sullivan, Sullivan, Hull & Ranger (Robert E. Sullivan, of counsel), for defendants.

BLACK, J. (for reversal).

By the Constitution this Court is charged with the primary duty of establishment, modification, amendment, and enforcement of the rules of practice in all Michigan courts (Const 1963, art 6). Indeed,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Darr v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Harker v. BushouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API