Morfessis v. Marvins Credit, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This appeal raises the question, among others, of the validity of service of process upon appellant. The marshal’s return showed service by leaving copies of summons and complaint “at his (appellant’s) usual place of abode with Katina Tsoulis a person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein at 809 3rd St., S. E.” 1
Appellant moved to quash service on the ground that he did not and never had lived at said address, that Katina Tsoulias did not reside there, and that said address was a place of business and the abode of no-one.
At hearing on the motion a deputy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Vilter Mfg. Co. v. RolaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Lalekos v. MansetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Fleming v. MaloufDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cruz-Packer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Leichtman v. KoonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Foster v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.