Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 36-83, (1983)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided August 24, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL D. BESADNY, Secretary Department of Natural Resources

You ask whether the Oneida Indian Tribe is a "governmental unit" within the meaning of section 144.07(4)(a), Stats., and whether it may be included in a joint sewerage commission. In my opinion, a tribal government is not a "governmental unit" within the meaning of the statute. Consequently, for this reason alone and without deciding whether a tribe voluntarily could subject itself to the jurisdiction of a joint sewerage commission, it is my opinion that the Oneida Indian Tribe may not be included as a member of such a commission.

Alt…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No. Oag 45-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987
  2. Opinion No. Oag 16-91, (1991), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API