Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1933No. 4-3061PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Section 6074 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest in effect provides, that beneficiaries may be changed in accordance with the laws, rules or regulations of the society. It is perfectly evident that any change of beneficiary in a policy of insurance issued by a fraternal benefit society must be done in substantial compliance with, the constitution and bylaws of such society.

It is perfectly evident that § 212 of the bylaws of the society was not substantially complied with. In effect this bylaw provides that the “surrender clause on the. back of her benefit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garabrant v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dennis v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API