STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANTHONY W. KALTER
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
In March 2012, a jury found Anthony W. Kalter (“Defendant”) guilty of the misde meanor crime of sexual misconduct in the second degree for exposing his genitals under circumstances in which he knew that his conduct was likely to cause affront or alarm. See section 566.098.1(1); .2. 1 The State alleged that the conduct occurred in Howell County between May 1, 2010 and August 16, 2010. 2 Defendant received a sentence of 180 days in the county jail. The trial court imposed ten days as “shock time[,]” suspended the remaining 170 days, and placed Defendant on a two-year term of probation. 3
Defendan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. KreutzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. RONALD R. SPRADLINGMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- State of Missouri v. Eric McCurtainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State of Missouri v. Thomas J. Savage, IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020