Murphy v. Hoenigmann
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carberry v. FoleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Brown v. ViningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Brown v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bervid v. DunnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- McDonough v. RudisillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thaxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988