Legal Opinion

Kent v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1904No. Calendar No. 20,766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus by Charles A. Kent and Bryant Walker, trustees of the estate of Frederick Buhl, deceased, to compel Perry F. Powers, auditor general, to cancel the sale of certain land for the taxes of 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

Frederick Buhl, at the time of his death, prior to the year 1897, was the owner of the S. \ of the N. W. £ and the N. \ of the S. W. •£, section 1, town 14 N., range 1 W. Relators are the trustees of his estate; petitioner Walker being the successor of one Robert Hosie, a former trustee.

It appears from the petition filed in this cause that Robert Hosie, former trustee, during his lifetime, had principal charge of the above-described property, with respect *606to the payment of taxes. December 3, 1897, Robert Hosie, as trustee, wrote to the township treasurer of Lee township, Midland county,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MonsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hand v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hough v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bray & Choate Land Co. v. NewmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Meller v. HodsdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jakobowski v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Crystal Lime & Cement Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API