Legal Opinion
Autozone, Inc. v. Duenes
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 19, 2003No. 13-02-00430-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice HINOJOSA.
This is a restricted appeal from a default judgment rendered in favor of appellee, Janie Duenes (“Duenes”). In a single issue, appellants, Autozone, Inc. (“Auto-Zone”) and Charles Wilson, in his capacity as manager (“Wilson”), contend the trial court did not have in personam jurisdiction over them when it granted the default judgment. We reverse and remand.
A. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Duenes sued Autozone and Wilson, in his capacity as manager, for personal injuries and damages sustained as a result of a battery explosion in one of Autozone’s Corpus…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Carmona v. Bunzl Distribution, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Diles v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Mask, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- In Re Guardianship of Cantu De Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Christopher De Leon D/B/A De Leon Aircraft Maintenance Professional v. Prabhuvaram J. Maddela, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024
- Correo, Inc. v. Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc., D/B/A Copeland Capital, Inc., Assignee of Valley Copier Systems, Inc., D/B/A vos/texas Financial Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Donald Gauci v. Kathryn Woessner Gauci, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.