Legal Opinion

Club Martinique, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1969No. 181-68_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves so-called federal cabaret taxes assessed against appellant pursuant to section 4231(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The sole question in the case is one of fact. Was the club one in which public performances were furnished for profit to its patrons or guests within the meaning of the above statute? The trial court, after a trial without a jury, made complete and appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law and answered the question in the affirmative. We have reviewed the record and certainly cannot say that the findings were clearly erroneous. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raulie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. Hill v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Club Martinique, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Crowther v. SeaborgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Butler v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. Richard L. Crowther, Willard Eames, Charles Morgan Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of James Hopkins Smith, Iii, and James Hopkins Smith, Iii, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Austral Oil Company and Cer Geonuclear Corporation, Colorado Open Space Coordinating Council, on Behalf of All Those Entitled to the Protection of Their Health and Safety and of the Health and Safety of Those Generations Yet Unborn, From the Hazards of Ionizing Radiation Resulting From the Distribution of Radioactive Materials Through the Permanent Biogeochemical Cycles of the Biosphere as a Result of the Defendants' Conduct of Project Rulison, and on Behalf of All Those Entitled to the Full Benefit, Use and Enjoyment of the National Natural Resource Treasures of the State of Colorado Without Degradation Resulting From Contamination With Radioactive Material Released as a Result of the Defendants' Conduct of Project Rulison, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Austral Oil Company, Incorporated and Cer Geonuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. H. Wayne Butler, D/B/A Wayne Butler Agency v. J. K. Scott and Lloyd Scott, D/B/A Scott Brothers Drilling Company v. Maryland Casualty Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API