Legal Opinion
Reyna v. First National Bank in Edinburg
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 21, 2001No. 13-99-546-CVPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellant, Ricardo V. Reyna (“Reyna”), appeals from a summary judgment, directed verdict, and jury’s take-nothing verdict on his claims against appellees, First National Bank in Edinburg (“FNB”) and David Penoli (“Penoli”). By ten points of error, Reyna contends the trial court erred in: (1) directing a verdict against him on his tortious interference with a contract claim; (2) directing a verdict against him on his contract for employment claim; (3) excluding exhibit 19; (4) granting summary judgment on his claims of intentional infliction of emotional…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Walker v. Ricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Birnbaum v. Law Offices of G. David Westfall, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Medistar Corp. v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Stanley v. CitiFinancial Mortg. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
- Alejandro v. Robstown Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.