Legal Opinion

Railway Co. v. Lilly

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM HAMBLEN. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamblen County. ~W. R. Hicks, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Thomas 73. Lilly, as administrator brought this action against the East Tennessee, Virginia and G-eorgia Kailway Company to recover damages for the alleged wrongful killing of his intestate, Luther Lilly, deceased.

Trial before Court and jury resulted in verdict and judgment for $1,500 in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appealed in error.

The only question for the consideration of this Court arises on the pleadings, and the action of the trial Judge thereon.

To the plaintiff’s declaration, which was good both in form and substance, the defendant filed a plea wherein it was averred that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holton v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Indianapolis, Pittsburg, & Cleveland Railroad v. Keely's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Woodward v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hogan v. McDanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. HurdTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Casey v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API