Legal Opinion · Dissent

Britt v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 2007No. COA06-714Published

1DissentElmore, Judge

Because I would hold that the 2004 amendment to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-415.1 is unconstitutional, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion.

*620As this Court stated in Johnson, we apply a two-part test to analyze whether a law imposes punishment retroactively:

First, the court must determine whether it was the legislature’s intent to impose a punishment or merely enact a civil or regulatory law. In reaching this determination, the court may consider the structure and design of the statute along with any declared legislative intent. Second, where it appears the legislature did not intend to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. United States v. NewboldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API