Legal Opinion
Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 15, 1985No. 69509PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Chief Judge.
Appellee Roy Hall sued his automobile casualty insurer, appellant Grange Mutual Casualty Company, to recover optional personal injury protection (PIP) allegedly due him under the theory of recovery set forth in Flewellen v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 250 Ga. 709 (300 SE2d 673) (1983). The insurer appeals an order granting partial summary judgment to Hall as to his entitlement to $45,000 in optional PIP coverage, a bad-faith penalty, and attorney fees.
The insurance application comprises two pages, consisting of a basic application form and a supplement. The basic application form…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. NixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Binns v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Colwell v. Voyager Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Tolison v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jefferson Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. PrickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Bob Lairsey Insurance Agency v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Hardy v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Britt v. Independent Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Bob Lairsey Insurance Agency v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.