Legal Opinion

Vasile v. Chisena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated June 7, 1999, which, inter alia, denied their motion to strike the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon receipt of the defendants’ notice for discovery and inspection, the plaintiff properly effectuated service of documentation in response thereto pursuant to CPLR 2103 (b) (6). The plaintiff submitted proof from his overnight…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Buonaccorso v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
  3. Lenchner v. ChasinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Henry v. Advance Process Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Ferro v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API