Legal Opinion

Buckley v. LaidLaw

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 14, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The writ brings up for review the action of the director of public affairs of West Orange in removing the prosecutor, a former health officer, after a hearing on charges. He had held the office for sixteen years. West Orange is governed under the Walsh act. Bormal charges were served before the hearing and were, we think, sufficiently definite to inform the prosecutor of the accusations upon which he would be tried.

It is argued that there was a lack of jurisdiction. O’Brien v. Parnell, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 99; 169 Atl. Rep. 539, is to the contrary. Since we think the charges were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zober v. TurnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. O'Brien v. ParnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Woodman v. BianchiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. MongielloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Kopitnikoff v. Lowenstein Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API