Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2005No. 485PA04PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The primary question presented for review is whether sentencing errors which violate a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to jury trial pursuant to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), may be deemed harmless. We conclude that Blakely errors are structural and modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals remanding defendant's case to Gaston County Superior Court for resentencing. Preliminarily, this Court must also examine the effect of Blakely on criminal sentencing in North Carolina. We…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API