Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Hyman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 22, 1903Published

Appeal from City Court of New York. Action by Adolph Rosenberg against Adolph Hyman and another. From a judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings, defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The complaint sets forth that on or about the 12th day of December, igoi, the defendants, for the purpose of securing the payment to plaintiff of the sum of $200, duly executed and delivered to the plaintiff a bond bearing date on that day, sealed with their separate seals, whereby they bound themselves, in the penalty of $400, upon condition that the same should be void if the defendant Adolph Hyman should pay to the plaintiff the sum of $200 within 60 days from the date thereof; that the defendant Adolph Hyman failed to pay said sum of $200, which became due on February 10, 1902, or any…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hull v. SmithThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  2. German Exch. Bank v. New Jersey & S. D. Brewing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API