In re the Marriage of Forrester

I agree with the majority that the trial court erred to the extent that it treated as support father’s purchase of nonsupport items or payments made directly to the child. My disagreement with the majority begins with its treatment of the credit card payments that father allegedly made in accordance with the parties’ agreement that those payments would satisfy the support obligation. The majority says that we need not decide whether the parties entered into an agreement to substitute father’s payment of the credit card bill for child support payments, because, even if the parties reached that…