Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 12, 1965No. 33874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The petitioner complains because he was not declared permanently and totally disabled but instead was found to have suffered injury rendering him permanently partially disabled to the extent of 65% of the body as a whole.

At the time of his injury the petitioner was 51 years of age, totally illiterate — his intelligence quotient is 60 and according to *44the clinical psychologist who testified he is by the “old nomenclature * * * feeble-minded, and [in] the new nomenclature * * * mentally retarded, moderate to severe in degree.” We learn that the claimant has a mild case of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Port Everglades Terminal Co. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  4. Scott v. KerrSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Ross v. RoySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Carson v. Gaineswood CondominiumsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Shaw v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. HG BODDIFORD PAINTING CONS., INC. v. BoddifordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API