Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Rudulph
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Bennet. Camden superior court. July 3, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
1. After it has been shown that a person was injured by the running of a locomotive or train of cars, the right of the injured person to recover damages for such injury is dependent upon whether or not the railroad company was negligent. The law raises the presumption that it was ; this *144presumption casts on the company the burden of introducing evidence to show that it was not; otherwise a recovery may be had on the presumption. The presumption is overcome only when the evidence is sufficiently strong to show due care. When the company has introduced evidence which would warrant the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sand Springs Park v. SchraderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Howard v. Georgia RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Southern Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907