Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Amarillo National Bank
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided November 7, 1985No. 07-84-0194-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
Limited partners in a partnership were summarily adjudged liable on their respective written guaranty agreements securing the payment of two notes to Amarillo National Bank. 1 Eight of the partners — Jack L. Morgan, Gary Jarmon, Larry D. Patton, M.C. Kratz, Jr., O.T. McCall, Canalino Resources, Inc. as successor in interest to Energy Associates, Gemini Lacquers, Inc., and Chock, a partnership — have appealed, 2 contending that their defense of usury and the existence of material fact issues preclude the rendition of summary judgment. We affirm.
In 1981, each of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Gar-Dal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kenneth L. Coffel, Cross-Appellee v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Martin v. First Rep. Bank, Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Llopa, Inc. v. Nagel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Rodriquez v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Rent America, Inc. v. Amarillo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.