Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Arturo Castellanos

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2013No. 12-4108Published

1DissentDavis, Circuit Judge

We are all familiar with the old legal saw:

When the facts are against you, hammer the law. When the law is against you, hammer the facts. When both are against you, hammer the table and yell like hell.

In re Fischer, 131 B.R. 137, 138 (E.D.Mo.1990).

The facts and the law cannot be ignored in this appeal. Nor can the pounding they take from the majority denude them of the power they possess.

The record before the district court established, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ‘Wilmer Castenada”1 was the alias of Appellant, who had a possessory interest in, and an undisputed right to exercise…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API