Legal Opinion

Couch v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 11, 1913No. 3277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Marshall County; J. W. Faulkner, Judge. Action by J. T. Couch against J. F. O’Brien to recover on two- promissory notes. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was originally filed in the justice court, and on appeal to the county court was tried to the court and a jury, and judgment rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff prosecuted an appeal to this court by petition in error and case-made.

The action was based on two promissory notes for $87.50 each, alleged to have been given as the balance of the purchase money on a piano sold by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error. The defendant in error acknowledged the purchase of the piano and the execution of the notes, but contends that there was a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson & Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Luger Furniture Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. National Bank of Anadarko v. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barber Medicine Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BirdIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API