State v. Goldman

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the larceny of a quantity of oil and four pumps, the property of Linderman & Company, Incorporated, a corporation. The case is presented under both assignments of error and specifications of causes for reversal.

The first two points urged for reversal are that there was no proof of ownership in the Linderman Oil Company, Incorporated, and that there was no proof of a felonious intent on the part of the plaintiff in error.

The history of the case was that Emerson was a tenant of 295 Badger avenue, Newark, under a lease from Linderman & Company. His rent became…