Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Amsberry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2017No. A156053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

*291*227Petitioner, who, in 2002, was convicted of one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, appeals from a judgment denying him post-conviction relief. This is petitioner's second appeal in the post-conviction proceeding. In the first appeal, we reversed the post-conviction court's denial of relief and remanded for a new post-conviction trial on petitioner's allegation that trial counsel had performed inadequately under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and ineffectively under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution in failing to prepare for and properly…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sodaro v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Sodaro v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API