Legal Opinion

Hiett v. Shull

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

cited 25 Gratt. 865; 1 Jarm. Wills (1880) p. 93, n. JB; 2 J3ouv. Diet. 83, 627 ; 1 Bouv. Diet. 807 ; 19 Am. Bep. 598. cited 94 U. S. 207 ; 11 W. Ya. 584; 20 W. Ya. 254; 23 W. Va. 579 ; 31 W. Ya. 581; 9 W. Ya. 327, 337; 2 Band. 442.

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, 'Judge :

This is a suit in equity, brought in the Circuit Court of Hampshire county, in July, 1888, by Charles N. Hiett, *564committee of Jolm Shaffer, against J. W. Sliull, charging, in substance, that John Shaffer is an old man eighty four years of age, unable to act with any proper and prudent management of his affairs, not able on account of mental imbecility to transact the ordinary affairs of life, to understand their nature and effect, or to have or to exercise any will of his own in relation thereto ; — that on the 10th day of April, 1888, and prior to plaintiff’s appointment as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Nicholas v. KershnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Coleman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  4. Cunningham v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Horner v. Marshall's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1817

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freeman v. FreemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Buckey v. BuckeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Calhoun County Bank v. EllisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Burkhamer v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API