Legal Opinion

Southern Brick Company v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 1938No. 14674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice FishburnE.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant to recover the balance of the purchase price alleged to be due for certain brick furnished to the defendant, and which were used in the construction of the latter’s dwelling house in the City of Laurens. The balance claimed amounted to $123.63, and the number of brick involved is about 9,500.

The defendant interposed a counterclaim for damages based upon allegations that he went to the brickyard of the plaintiff near Ninety Six, in this State, and selected a par ticular type of brick…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Lewis v. W. D. Rountree & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reliance Varnish Co. v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. C. W. Anderson Hosiery Co. v. Dixie Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API