Legal Opinion

Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 1976No. 61475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG

delivered the opinion of the court:

Eloy J. Aranda (plaintiff) brought suit against The Hobart Manufacturing Corporation (defendant) and another party. After dismissal for want of prosecution, another suit was filed in his behalf. In due course the trial court dismissed the second suit under Supreme Court Rule 103(b). (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, R. 103(b).) Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff contends that the filing of his second action was permitted within the letter of the applicable provision of the limitations statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 83, par. 24a) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Ray v. BokorneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Galvan v. MoralesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Brown v. BurdickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Quirino v. Chicago Tribune-New York News Syndicate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gendek v. JehangirIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kutnick v. GrantIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Meyer v. WardropAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Kristan v. Belmont Community HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API