Legal Opinion

City of Richardson v. Responsible Dog Owners of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. C-9464PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPEARS, Justice.

At issue is the validity of the City of Richardson’s animal control ordinance. Several people, denominated as Responsible Dog Owners, sued for declaratory judgment, alleging that the legislature, through its enactment of sections 1.08 and 42.12 of the Texas Penal Code, has preempted the City’s power to adopt an ordinance regulating the keeping of dogs. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the City. The court of appeals, however, held that the City’s ordinance was preempted by the Penal Code, reversed the trial court’s judgment, and rendered judgment in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. FallTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. City of Weslaco v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Houston v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Knott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Responsible Dog Owners v. City of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Dallas Merchant's & Concessionaire's Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. City of Laredo, Texas v. Laredo Merchants AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. J.M.K. 6, Inc v. Gregg & Gregg, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. RCI Entertainment (San Antonio), Inc. D/B/A XTC Cabaret v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API