Legal Opinion

State v. Degrenier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1980No. 80-215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, C.J.

The question in this aggravated felonious sexual assault case is whether RSA 632-A:2 VIII (Supp. 1979) is void for vagueness or overbreadth because of the use in that statute, without definition, of the term “mentally defective.” We uphold the statute.

The defendant was indicted under RSA 632-A:2 VIII (Supp. 1979) for aggravated felonious sexual assault because he allegedly had sexual intercourse with a mentally defective woman who was not his spouse, with reason to know that she was mentally defective. The defendant moved that the indictment be dismissed, claiming that the statute was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Douglas v. BuderSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Keim v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  4. Bozarth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. KEELEYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API