Legal Opinion

Conditt v. Holcek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1947No. 14845Published

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

This is an OPA penalty case under provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 901-925, and Maximum Price Regulations 540, as amended, wherein Sylvester Holcek, appellee, su'ed C. B. Con-ditt, and the partnership of Parsons and Matthews, in the 96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, and received a judgment based on jury findings, ,in the sum of $1,500.00, including- attorneys fees, derived from an overcharge on the sale of an automobile.

Appellee alleged and proved that on January 8, 1946, he purchased a 1940 Chevrolet automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Melia v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  2. Jung v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Bowles v. Yankee Brewing Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Burns v. HeckleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. United States v. MutarielliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API